Same U.S. Attorneys that defrauded the U.S. Congress and Federal court about Obama’s case and Obama’s IDs by claiming to act on behalf of the U.S. Congress while keeping the U.S. Congress in the dark, have embarked on a 13 billion shakedown of JP Morgan. How much of this money will go sideways? Which banks will be next for the shakedown? Citi? BofA? Wells Fargo? Goldman? How much will the companies have to give in “donations” to the Democratic party candidates to be left alone??? It reminds me of Stalin and the U.S.S.R as well as Germany in 1930s.

Posted on | October 20, 2013 | 7 Comments

As I am finalizing the appellants brief in the Grinols case, I can’t stop thinking about the magnitude of corruption in the WH and the DOJ? If you recall, I filed the Grinols case in the Eastern District of CA. U.S. Attorney Benjamin Wagner and assistant U.S. Attorney Ed Olsen appeared before Judge England and claimed that they represent the U.S. Congress and the U.S. Electoral college. They claimed that their clients wanted this case dismissed and that they are satisfied with Obama’s IDs. Later I found out that they simply lied and went behind the back of the U.S. Congress and behind the back of the members of the U.S. Electoral college, they never provided their alleged clients with any documents and pleadings and rushed to dismiss the case defrauding both the Congress and the court.
You can read the latest article in the NY times to see that Benjamin Wagner, Tony West and Eric Holder engaged in the biggest shakedown in the U.S. history, where they threatened criminal charges against the JP Morgan and got 13 billion in a tentative agreement.
I am wondering where all of this money will go to at the end of the day. For example. Obama was stating that there is no money to pay for security for U.S. citizens to visit the White House, which is less than 1 million, however Obama had no problem finding 100 million for security and other expenses to travel to Africa.
DOJ have no money to investigate crimes, however it had enough money to use its outreach department to incite racial riots in Florida and elsewhere all over the country.
Under Obama NASA fired thousands of people in Florida due to budget cuts, but had millions of dollars for an outreach to Muslims in Indonesia.
There was no money to assure the security of the U.S. ambassador in Benghazi, but there was enough money to topple the government there, institute a private central bank there, bring dozens of CIA agents who reportedly got hold of Muamar Qaddafi’s weapons and smuggled them to Al Qaeda insurgents in Syria.
You can catch my drift. The more money Obama and Dems get, the bigger the appetite, the bigger the radius for shakedowns, I have no doubt other banks and large companies will be next in line. Moreover, not so long ago Trump appeared on National TV and stated that Democrat AG in NY filed a bogus law suit against him because Trump did not give enough in donations.
I am not saying that banks should not be held accountable, they should, however this administration is acting in a typical Chicago style and I can guarantee you that the appetite will only increase and after JP Morgan we’ll see similar charges against other banks and other large companies or we will see a shakedown in the form of bundling of donations for Democratic party candidates. With more donations, there will be a stronger grip on power, silencing of opposition. Make no mistake that the latest Health care bill is a massive shakedown of the whole population of this nation. Obamacare tax or as I call it “The breathing tax” today is $2,000 or 1% of your income, whichever is more.
Here is small reminder for you: nearly 100 years ago, when the income tax was introduced in 1913, it was only 1% and only 1% of the high-earners paid it. Now most of us pay the income tax and it goes up to nearly 40% of your income. Obama’s father, Hussein Senior wrote an article stating that it is ok for the government to take a 100% of people’s earnings, as long as the government decides that the money goes to your own good. So, who is going to decide, what is good for us? Hussein Junior? Moochelle? Valerie Jarett? Eric holder? Tony West? Benjamin Wagner? and besides, how do you call a situation where the government takes a 100% and decides what do you need? You call it slavery, GULAG or worse …
Please, make it go viral!

New York Times

See realtime coverage

US Deal With JPMorgan Spurred by a Phone Call

New York Times

- ‎34 minutes ago‎

During talks over a tentative $13 billion settlement, Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr Justin Sullivan/Getty Images During talks over a tentative $13 billion settlement, Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr.

27:09

Taitz report 10.18.2013 Will Judge Lamberth seek a Special Prosecutor in Obama’s fabricated SSS?

2 days ago
1,013 views

Report on a case dealing with Obama’s use of a fabricated Selective Service certificate with a fabricated cancellation USPS stamp and other fabricated IDs, review of current events, what…